Cloud Four Blog

Technical notes, War stories and anecdotes

Make Your Blog Faster & Help Save the Environment

For those in the Portland area, I’m going to be leading an informal session at this week’s Beer and Blog on how to optimize your blog for performance and why doing so is good for the environment.

More on how performance is connected to the environment in a moment, but first, the details on when and where:

Beer and Blog – Make Your Blog Load Fast & Save the Environment
Green Dragon Bistro & Brewpub
928 SE 9th Ave.
Portland, Oregon 97214
RSVP | Add to Calendar | Map

The Impact of Data Centers on the Environment

HP Efficient Computing at SNWEveryone is aware that our ability to reduce our energy consumption is a key component to reducing the impact we have on the environment.

However, it wasn’t until I was asked to speak to the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) at Storage Networking World last fall that I realized how important this is for those who run data centers.

At the time, I observed:

Several businesses are now being told that they cannot bring any more power into their data centers. The power company is simply refusing to provide them with more capacity.

In many cases, the cost of powering and cooling a data center exceed the costs of the hardware within two years.

The people in the storage industry get it. The SNIA has started the Green Storage Initiative to foster innovative ways of reducing power consumption in data centers.

The question is are those of us who are web developers doing our part? Sadly, no.

Web Site Gluttons

Web developers live insulated lives. We have broadband at our homes and our offices and it shows. We’ve stopped paying attention to the size of web pages.

Andrew King recently highlighted research showing that the average size of web pages has doubled since 2003. “Longer term statistics show that since 1995 the size of the average web page has increased by 22 times, and the number of objects per page has grown by 21.7 times.”

Growth of Average Web Page Size and Number of Objects

Source: http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/average-web-page/

In addition to the size of web pages, few sites are optimized to ensure that browsers cache the files and don’t request the same files repeatedly.

Steve Souders recently conducted a thought experiment on how much CO2 would be saved by optimizing the Wikipedia home page. He used the CO2stats.com estimate that “three minutes on a Web site generates three grams of CO2 – roughly equal to the amount one person generates by breathing for 4.5 minutes.”

Steve estimated that the optimization could save “5,000 kilowatt-hours per year or approximately 500-1000 pounds of CO2 emissions.”

Why Now?

I’ve been interested in web optimization for ever since it saved my prior company tens of thousands of dollars a few years ago. I’ve been speaking on the topic whenever possible and trying to help web developers understand how much benefit they can get by optimizing their pages and how easy it is to do.

A couple of weeks ago, I finally watched An Inconvenient Truth. At the conclusion of the film I started thinking about what more I could do. I’m getting a bike ready to use for my commute to work. I’m reducing the energy I use. I’m contemplating a vegetarian diet.

And I’ve redoubled my commitment to getting web developers to take site performance seriously. It saves money, improves the experience for your customers, and it’s easy to do.

Most importantly, if you care about global warming, optimizing your site is a moral imperative.

So come join us tomorrow at the Green Dragon to make your blog faster and reduce the energy it consumes.

5 Comments on “Make Your Blog Faster & Help Save the Environment”

  1. […] Make Your Blog Faster & Help Save the Environment : Cloud Four Jason Grigsby writes “A couple of weeks ago, I finally watched An Inconvenient Truth. At the conclusion of the film I started thinking about what more I could do. I’m getting a bike ready to use for my commute to work. I’m reducing the energy I use. I’m contemplating a vegetarian diet. And I’ve redoubled my commitment to getting web developers to take site performance seriously. It saves money, improves the experience for your customers, and it’s easy to do. Most importantly, if you care about global warming, optimizing your site is a moral imperative.” […]

  2. […] environment at Beer and Blog this afternoon. I’ve put up a post on Cloud Four’s blog talking more about the connection between performance and the environment. If you’re in the Portland area, it would be great to […]

  3. Gary Walter says:

    Bigger, better faster. Interesting stats – directly correlated with the proliferation of broadband.

    I remember my first website back in 94/95 – it was strictly html and a couple of small photos. With dialup, speed was of the essence. Then I became the tech coordinator at a university with a T-1 – Tstinking1!!!! I lost all control and began to post photos of 150kb, or so.

    You make a really good argument for the management of energy resources. Good for you – wish I could be there tonight, but can’t make it in – but you sold me!!

  4. Christophe Strobbe says:

    The optimization of Wikipedia reminds me of “Blackle – Energy Saving Search” (www.blackle.com), a white-on-black version of Google. Blackle’s About page states:
    ‘Blackle saves energy because the screen is predominantly black. “Image displayed is primarily a function of the user’s color settings and desktop graphics, as well as the color and size of open application windows; a given monitor requires more power to display a white (or light) screen than a black (or dark) screen.” Roberson et al, 2002

    In January 2007 a blog post titled Black Google Would Save 750 Megawatt-hours a Year proposed (ecoiron.blogspot.com/2007/01/black-google-would-save-3000-megawatts.html) the theory that a black version of the Google search engine would save a fair bit of energy due to the popularity of the search engine.’

  5. MarcusT says:

    Please give some context to the statement “5,000 kilowatt-hours per year or approximately 500-1000 pounds of CO2 emissions.” – is this the saving per visitor to Wikipedia over the course of the year, and if so is the saving at the client side or server side? Or is it the cumulative saving at the Wikipedia servers over the course of a year across all visitors?